Just confirming, is it correct that the quadric error of the original vertex should be zero because it is on the plane of each of its constituent triangles?
zhouwen
@sarukkai I think so!
kencheng
In lecture, Kayvon said something that the vertex was an average of distance matrices, but it looks like a plain sum here?
alexz
Also confused about the error. In this picture, it doesn't show the assumed V, right?
alexz
But how do we interpret the slide 73? it shows we have to set Q at each vertex and we need the Q of the endpoints of an edge to calculate the error of an edge.
Just confirming, is it correct that the quadric error of the original vertex should be zero because it is on the plane of each of its constituent triangles?
@sarukkai I think so!
In lecture, Kayvon said something that the vertex was an average of distance matrices, but it looks like a plain sum here?
Also confused about the error. In this picture, it doesn't show the assumed V, right?
But how do we interpret the slide 73? it shows we have to set Q at each vertex and we need the Q of the endpoints of an edge to calculate the error of an edge.